US or Iran — Who Needs a New Truce Deal More?
· news
A War of Attrition: Who’s Burning Out First?
As the cycle of attacks between the US and Iran escalates, it has become increasingly clear that both sides cannot sustain this pace for much longer. Despite claims from both nations that they are not interested in negotiations or a ceasefire, economic and political pressures are taking their toll.
For Iran, the war is a double-edged sword. On one hand, it has allowed Tehran to test its military capabilities and assert dominance in the region. However, the human cost has been high, with thousands of casualties on both sides, including civilians caught in the crossfire. The economic toll is equally significant: decades of US sanctions have crippled Iran’s economy, making it increasingly difficult for the country to fund its military interventions.
The impact of these sanctions has been brutal. Oil exports have dropped from 2.2 million barrels per day in 2012 to 1.5 million bpd in 2025, and GDP per capita has plummeted from $8,000 in 2012 to $5,000 in 2024.
Meanwhile, the US is facing its own set of challenges. The war on Iran has been highly unpopular among Americans, with a recent YouGov poll showing that 57% believe it was the wrong decision by the Trump administration. The war looms uncomfortably over Republicans as midterm elections approach in November, when the party risks losing its congressional majority.
Crude prices have surged by 12 percent following the latest wave of US attacks on Iran, and petrol prices at US stations have reached $4.63 per gallon ($1.22 per liter) in May – a significant increase from pre-war levels. This is reflected in living expenses across the country, making the war increasingly unpopular with Americans.
The US has also been running low on certain munitions, including seven of its most powerful and expensive types. At least four of these saw half their stockpiles depleted in the first phase of the war. The US has focused on striking Iran with these high-end weapons, but replenishing them may be a challenge – especially if the war continues.
Regional diplomacy has been spurring Gulf countries to tighten military cooperation by sharing data and coordinating warning systems. Pakistan, the principal mediator between the US and Iran, has urged both sides to end the latest wave of violent attacks and hold talks. It’s time for Washington and Tehran to listen – before it’s too late.
The stakes are high, but one thing is certain: neither side can afford to keep up this war of attrition much longer. The question now is: who will blink first?
Reader Views
- RJReporter J. Avery · staff reporter
The US and Iran are locked in a cycle of attacks that's starting to look like a war of attrition by design rather than necessity. Both sides claim they're not interested in negotiations or a ceasefire, but the economic and political pressures are mounting. What's striking is how both nations have calculated the human cost of their actions – for Iran, it's testing military capabilities at the expense of civilian lives; for the US, it's trading lost munitions for inflated petrol prices at home. One can't help but wonder if this stalemate will be broken when one side finally realizes its costs outweigh its benefits.
- EKEditor K. Wells · editor
The US and Iran's war of attrition is a lose-lose proposition for both parties, but the real victim here is the global economy. The recent surge in crude prices has far-reaching implications beyond American gas stations, with the potential to trigger inflationary pressures worldwide. While the article correctly points out the economic woes faced by Iran due to US sanctions, it's equally crucial to examine how this conflict is impacting the delicate balance of the global oil market and the repercussions for consumers and investors in countries not directly involved in the conflict.
- CSCorrespondent S. Tan · field correspondent
The escalating cycle of attacks between the US and Iran is a stark reminder that both nations are running on fumes. While the article accurately highlights the economic toll on both sides, it overlooks a crucial aspect: the long-term strategic implications of this war. The US's dwindling munitions supply is more than just a logistical concern – it's a warning sign that its military might be overstretched and its options severely limited in the region. This should give pause to Washington policymakers who still insist on maintaining a hardline stance against Tehran.
Related articles
More from Cronik
- › Wildfire Smoke Threatens America's Communities
- › Kane Uncertain About England's World Cup Future
- › Singapore's Retail Sector Faces US$815m Challenge from Johor Rail
- › Germany neo-Nazi sent to men's prison after gender switch
- › Blue Angels' Low-Flying Stunt Sparks Safety Concerns
- › UnitedHealth Group Sees $5.4 Billion Profits Amid Easing Costs